Olivio Assignment Business Law Essay

later on reading the above and based on the definition of theft in the text, is if bazaar to convict a person for thievery if he did not leave the expound without paying(a) for the proportion in his self-denial? Does captive to deprive have anything to do with the outcome of a case of larceny? What do you look? Also, should the penalty for larceny vary, depending on where the individualist is caught or the vaulting horse value of the good constituten? justifyAccording to NYS penal law (155. 05), A person fall aways property and commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or to a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner hence. So I moot it is handsome to convict a person for larceny even if he or she did not actually leave the premises without paying for the property in his or her possession.In the case of Olivio, the story clearly express that he stopped to look s ome several times, which confirms that his motive was indeed to steal the deal- the story also stated that he ran right past the cash registers in order to make an exit with the merchandise which further confirms that he intended to take the merchandise without paying. Which shows intent to deprive..I believe the penalty for larceny should vary depending on the dollar value of the merchandise that was taken- I however do not think that the penalty should vary according to where the individual is caught. Where the individual is caught is irrelevant- what matters is retrieving the merchandise and or property that was stolen and punishing the person who stole it.